About your Search

20091101
20091130
Search Results 0 to 20 of about 21 (some duplicates have been removed)
that this runoff would be as corrupt as the old one. >> barack obama has a problem. >> that is an understatement. >> he has an afghan government that is an on were the partner. -- unworthy partner. cricket, corrupt, involved in that -- corporate, corrupt, involved in the -- crooked, corrupt, involved in the heroin business. yes to make a decision about what general mcchrystal has recommended. all indications are that we will see something along the lines of mcchrystal lite. >> it reminds me of 1972 in south vietnam when the president ran for reelection and the was no one to run against him. he is the one, the only one. >> prime minister gordon brown made clear that the british troops -- >> a single military officer -- sound familiar? >> certain tests have to be met and probably cannot be met by this afghan government -- corruption and openness and reform. i think it is a way of great britain leaving afghanistan. >> gordon brown said this weekend that he is not leaving, that they cannot end their commitment there and walk away. >> election 2009. >> it is very clear that the voters of the common w
that this onwould be as corrupt as e old one. what do you make of that? >> well -- barack obama has a problem. that isn understatement. >> he has an afghan govement that is an unworthy partner. he has karza who is -- whose brother is arook, corrupt involved in e hern busess. he has tmake a decision about what general mcchrystal has recommended, and all signs indicate that weillee something ong the lines of mcrystalite, wch is noto give t 40,000 troops by -- >> it reminds me of 72 in south etnamhen the presint ran for reelection, only ther was nobodto rungainst him, that slan w "choose the one, the only one." >> can you have confince in karzai's government? >> it is diminishing on the part of the british. pre minister gordon brown made clear that the troops -- >> by a sile military officer -- sound familia >> that there were cerin tests that had been met and probably cannot be met by this afan gornment of corption and opness and reform. but it is a way of great britain leaving afghanistan. >> well, gordon browsaid this weeken that he is not leaving, that there is commitment tt they cannot wal
one. what do you think of that? >> barack obama has a problem. >> that is an understatement. >> he has got an afghan government that is an unworthy partner in this adventure. he is part -- he has karzai, who is a clerk, corrupt, involved in that heroin business, and there is no indication that anything will happen to him. he has a week afghan government to work with. he now estimates the decision about what to do with what general mcchrystal has recommended. -- he now has to make a decision about what general mcchrystal has recommended. all signs are that it will be along the lines of mcchrystal lite, not t give him 40,000 troops -- but >> it reminds me of 1972 in south viet nam or the president ran for reelection, only nobody ran against him so "choose the one, the only one at." [laughter] >> can you have confidence in karzai? >> it is diminishing on the part of the british. prime minister gordon brown made clear that those troops -- >> a single military officer -- sound familiar? >> an afghan they were treating -- there were certain tests that have to be bad and probably cannot be me
in delaware, president obama saw the real prize american fighting men and women and their families are paying for the war in afghanistan. in the pre-dawn darkness, the commander-in-chief what is the return of 18 americans who were killed in afghanistan were -- it is to the return of 18 americans were killed in afghanistan this week. >> obviously, it was a sobering reminder of the extraordinary sacrifices that our young men and women in uniform are engaging in every single day, not only our troops, but their families as well. >> as casualties mount, the president and his national security team continue to deliberate strategy going forward. >> every day that goes by without that decision being made, the more days there are wary youngmericans are unnecessarily in harm's way, in my view. >> a marine combat veteran of iraq has become the first american official to resign in protest against the war in afghanistan. >> i believe that the people we are fighting there are fighting us because we are occupying that, not for ideological reasons or because of links to al qaeda or fundamental hatred towards
.ncicap.org-- >> next tuesday, december 1, president obama is expected to reveal to the nation his policy on afghanistan, after which he intends to go up to capitol hill in an effort to shore up support among democrats. his goal, he says, is to stop al qaeda from operating in afghanistan. >> it is in our strategic interest, in our national security interest, to make sure that al qaeda and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively in those areas. we are quick to dismantle and degrade the capabilities and -- going to dismantle and degrade their capabilities and destroy their networks. >> to powerful democrats are talking about a war tax. >> there will be no money for nothing if we put it all into afghanistan. >> i think adding some additional income tax to the upper brackets, $250,000. >> senator carl levin and congressman david obey. the number-cruncher's tell us the price tag for our soldiers and marines and other military personnel in afghanistan is about $1 million each. stimulus money is flowing out of the federal treasury, who knows what a new health care structure will cost, fighting two wars
, not capable of doing anything to you look at obama wobbling and not getting anything done. people who do not just watch cable tv and enjoy the yelling, they wonder what they are doing here. this is a test of whether the fsystem functions at all. it is stupid that they have these soldiers over abortion. -- sideshow's over abortion. the issue is not stupid, but it is a sly joke from the main event. -- sideshow from the main event. >> i think we in the electronic media help, because there is so much instant communication, and the amount of disinformation people are all like to get away with on television -- this week, apparently, those of us who are supposed to watch each other for a living missed the fact that hannity on fox had mixed to rallies, one from the day -- >> jon stewart made fun of him. >> but we are at a point of disinformation -- i don't know what happened with this voting present. >> it was an interesting thing. several republican house members -- republicans are almost unanimously pro-life party in the house -- when the stupak amendment was introduced, they realize that if i
washington has become a failed state not capable of doing anything, you look at obama not getting anything done. outsiders, people who do not just watch cable tv and enjoy yelling, are wondering what they're doing here. this is a frustrating that they have these stupid sideshows. >> catholic bishops don't think it is stupid. >> i don't think the issue is stupid, but it is a sideshow to the main event. >> i suppose we in the electronic media help because there is so much instant communication and the type of misinformation that people are allowed to get away with on television -- most recently this week, apparently, those of us who watch each other for a living missed the fact that hannity on fox mixed two -- one from the day -- >> jon stewart made fun of him. >> this lack of a disinformation -- i don't know what happened with this voting -- >> it was an interesting thing. republican house members -- a unanimously pro-life party in the house -- the stupak amendment, supported by the pro- life side -- they realize that if it were accepted, the pro- life members of the democratic side would v
institute --www.ncicap.org-- >> nt tuesday, dember 1, president obama is expecteto reveal to the natn what he plans do on afghanistan cod afterwards, he will go to capitol hill in an fort to shore up support among democrats. his go, he says, is to stop al qaeda fr operating in afghanistan. >> it is in our strategic interest, natial-security interest, toake sure that al eda and its extremist allies cannooperate effectively in those areas. we are going to dismantl the greater pabilities and timately dismantle andestroy thr networks. >> at leastwo perful democrats are talking about war tato pay for the new rategy. >>here will be no moy for nothing if we put it l into afghanistan. >> i think the stated purpose of addin additionaincome tax to the upperrackets, more than 250,000. >> senator carl levin and congressman david ey. the number-cncher's tell us that the price g for soldis and marines and other military rsonnel in afghanistans about $1 million eh. who knows what a new health care structure will co? weighting two wars in some tennis agree -- multaneously. will the president go head-- he
state produce the obama wobbling, not gettinanything done. outsiders, people who do not just wat cable tv and enjoy yelling, mt wder,hat are they doing here? it is a test o whether the system functio at all. it ifrustrating that they ha these stid psychos over abortion. > -- spid side shows over aborti. i don't tnk that the iss is stupid, but it is a sideshow of the main event. >> i suppose we in the electronic media hp, because theris so much instant communication, and the kind of misinformati that peop are allowed to get away with on television -- most recently, this week, appently, those of us who are supposed to watch ea other for a living, at least in part, missed the fact that fox -- hannity on fox had mixed two rallies, one frothe day -- >> jon stewart fun of him. -- made fun of him. >> but w are at point of disinformation -- ion't know what ppened with this votg present -- >> it waan interesting thing. the reblicans are almost unanimously pro-life party in the house. enhe stupakmendment, troduced by the pro-life side, was introduced, they rlize that if it were aepted, these pro
atrocities as the obama administration of doing. -- guilty of the same thing as charles says the obama administration is guilty of doing. >> what is its civilian court first khalid sheik mohammed -- why is it civilian court for ksm? >> if you can lay out the evidence -- this guy was not admitting in open court that he did this, but when all over guantanamo saying that he did this. if you have a trial that shows the world that the calculated disregard for life that he was responsible for, you may in a system of justice that is a model of something to show the world. >> how do you keep waterboarding out of this truck is prejudicial? -- out of this trial is prejudicial? >> i don't think you can. charles is trying to apply logic something that doedefies logic. it is about the symbolism. in this complicated or whatever, we are holding on to a little shred of the -- rule of the. this complicated war on terror, we are hold onto a little shred of rule law. >> if the idea is to show the world the superiority of our system and rule of law, how can you have eric holder asked in the hearing what i
the obama wobbling, not getting ything done. outsiders, people who do not just watchable tv and enjoy yelling, mus wonr, wt are they doing here? it is a test of whether the system functionst all. it is ustrating that they have these stup psychos over abortion. > -- stud side shows over abortion don't thi that the issues stupid, but it is a sideshow of the main event. >> i suppose we in the electronic media hel because there so much instant communication, and the kind of misinformation that peoplere allowed to get away with on levision- most recently, this week, appartly, those of us who are supposed to watch eachther for living, at least inart, missed the fact that fox --annity on foxad mixed two rallies, one from e day -- >>on stewartun of him. -- made fun of him. >> but we are at aoint of disinformation -- i d't know what haened with this votin present -- >> it was interesting thing. the repuicans are almost unanimously a o-life party in the house. wh t stupak andment, inoduced by the pro-life side, was introduced, they reaze that if it were accted, these pro-life members on the d
is accusing the obama administration of -- the same thing that draws is accusing the obama administration of doing. the bush administration said that they would do whatever they could to get out, they wanted. sometimes it would be military commissions, sometimes civilian court. >> white civilian court for -- why civilian court for ksm? eric holder never explained why. give me one reason. >> this guy was n just a minute in open court that he does, he apparently went all over guantanamo that he did this. if you have a child that shows the wld the calculated -- disregard for calculated if you had a tryout -- if you have a trail that shows the will to tackle the disregard for life that he has, you might have something to show the world. >> how do you keep waterboarding out of this trial as prejudicial? >> i don't think you will. charles is trying to apply logic to something that defies logic. this is about symbolism. we are trying to show the world that in this complicated war on terror, we are hanging onto a little shred of the rule of law. >> and the evidence did not come from waterboarding
thing that charles accuses the obama administration of doing. th bush administration decided too everything they could to cheapen up, they wt. sometimes it would a -- military commission ato aieve theutcome they wa. sometimes would bin the to the commission, sometimes civilian trial. >> why civilian court for ksm? eric holder never explaid why. >> this y was not just admitting an open court thate did this, but appently went all over guantanamo sing that he did this. if you hav a trial that shs the world t callated disregd for life thahe w responsible for, youay tually, in a system o justice at is a model, have something to showhe world. >> how do you keep the waterboarding t ofhis trial asrejudicial? >> don't think theyill, becae t press will bring in even if the court do not. charles is trying to apply logic something that defies logic. it is about the symbolm. in this screwe up, a complicad war on terrorism, we are still holng onto a shred of the rule of law. >> look,et me say a word about that -- if the idea is to show the world the superiori of our system and the rule law,
center, colby. >>he bush administration wa guilty of thsame thing that arles accuses the obama administration of doing. the bush administration decided to d everything they could to cheapen up, they wan sometimes it would be -- litary commission a achve the ocome they want sometimes itould be the to e commission, sometimes civilian trial. >> why civilian court for ksm? eric holder never exained why. >> ts guy was not just admitting an open court at he did ts, butpparently went all over guantanam saying that heid this. if youave a trial thashows the wor thealculated diegard for lifehat he was responsie for, you may acally, in a system of justice th is a model, have something to show t world. >> how do you keep the waterboarding ouof ts trial as pjudicial? >> ion't think they wl, becaus theress will bring in even if the court does not. charles is trying to apply logic toomething that defies logic. it is about the symbolis in this screwed up, a complicatewar onerrorism, we e still holdi onto a shred of the rule of law. >> look, l me say a word about that -- if the idea is to sho
Search Results 0 to 20 of about 21 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)